Caldwell Tower by Uplawmoor
John West writes:
Caldwell Tower in East Renfrewshire was recently featured in a Channel 4 television series about the restoration of a number of small historic buildings. The particular programme repeated the owner’s belief that his tower was built in the 15th century and was the last standing portion of a large mediaeval castle which stood by Uplawmoor on the hillside above Loch Libo. Artistic licence and a considerable amount of imagination was used to produce an image of a Renfrewshire Camelot.
A different picture has emerged from research undertaken over the past two years by an East Renfrewshire Historic Designed Landscape Group supported by the Garden History Society in Scotland. The group has been studying and surveying a number of sites in the area including the designed landscapes associated with Caldwell House.
The present Caldwell House was built in 1773 for William Mure, Baron of the Exchequer of Scotland, to the designs of Robert and James Adam. The house was originally planned as a rather plain classical box but the detailing was changed by the addition of a machiolated cornice with small bartizan towers, and the house as built is one of the last of the Adam castellated mansions. However, whilst site was new, this was not the first property at Caldwell.
Timothy Pont’s 1580 map of Renfrewshire (below) shows a substantial tower house at Caldwell. It appears to be located above the southern end of Loch Libo, which would place it some distance from the site of the present house.
The nature of Pont’s map is such that buildings are represented rather than accurately sketched and we cannot be sure what the building actually looked like. The indications are that it was a tower and may have had a barmkin wall or enclosure, but it was certainly not a large or important multi-towered castle. Little seems to be known about the occupation of this tower at Caldwell. The main branch of the Mure family lived at Glanderston a few miles from Caldwell and whilst the Blaeu map of 1654 identifies a number of properties in the area it does not show any inhabited site for Caldwell. It may be that the old tower had been abandoned by this date.
In 1666 William Mure was attainted for his support of the covenanters’ cause and went into exile in Holland where he died in 1670. The Caldwell estates were restored to the family in 1690 following the accession of William of Orange to the English throne, and eventually passed in 1722 to the nephew of William Mure of Glanderston, another William who became Baron Mure in the same year.
It has been suggested that a new house commenced building in the early part of the 18th century on the recently restored family property. It is not clear when this house was completed as General Roy’s map (below) of 1746 shows a tree lined avenue, an elaborate garden of intersecting alleys, and a walled enclosure, but no house.
However, Jean Hunter Blair (the sister-in-law of Colonel William Mure, the heir to Baron Mure) writing from Caldwell in 1799 reports that “Mr Mure is at present in the very agony of making a new garden on the Brandy Hill behind the stables and offices. He has converted the old house into stables and means next year to take away the offices entirely which will be an immense improvement to the place for at present they are not a beautiful ornament.”
Survey work by the volunteers has identified the living remnants of an avenue of old limes and the location of tree root hollows in patterns corresponding with the Roy garden. In addition there still exist the footings of the large enclosure and a levelled platform suitable for a house close to a stone water pump of classical design. The presence of fragments of plaster, pottery and slate in disturbances on this latter site suggest that the older dwelling was indeed on the top of the rising land in front of the Adam house. Unlike the current house, the demolished property and the ‘new’ garden looked out across the intervening valley to the site of Pont’s tower house.
The Armstrong map of 1775 (below) suggests the fate of the tower house as it identifies a ‘Ruin’ on the hillside above Loch Libo corresponding approximately with the location of that provided by Pont.
Fifteen years later, after the completion of the Adam house, Ainsley’s map of the area (below) shows a castellated tower, described as a ‘Pigeon House’ (circled), on the site of the ruin.
The tower is still visible from the hill on which the pre Adam house was built, and without the trees which have grown up over the intervening years, this ornamental ‘Pigeon house’ would have been the principal eye catcher in the landscape as seen from this viewpoint. In fact the group’s survey work has revealed the presence within the “new garden” layout of a belvedere or bastion which looks directly to Caldwell tower.
Further documentary research will be needed to establish exactly when the site of the ruin acquired its castellated pigeon house, but it seems likely that it was contemporary with, or shortly after, the construction of the castellated Adam mansion house.
It seems probable that the Caldwell tower that we see today was constructed as a decorative feature in the landscape surrounding Caldwell House. Its construction on the site of the earlier tower, and possible incorporation of remnants or materials from the original building, would no doubt also have provided a link or memorial to the Mure family past and a reminder of how the family’s fortunes had improved.
There is no evidence for the conjectured ‘Camelot’, but the story of the tower is no less romantic in its own way. It is sad that this small element in the landscape has fared better than the mansion itself, as Caldwell House now lies roofless waiting for another map to describe it as a ruin.
Reprinted from The Journal of The Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland, 2010.
Update
It is now a year on from the Channel 4 Restoration Man programme referred to in the article about the B listed Caldwell Tower. In the intervening period planning permission was granted for a modest ground floor extension and a covering for the external stair giving access to the upper room of the tower. Conditions were attached to the permission for the expressed purpose of protecting the visual amenity and historical and architectural character of the tower. Roofing was to be in thick blue slate and weatherboarding to be in natural wood. Though not specifically included we imagined that window frames would be similarly treated so that the finished extension would blend in with the tower allowing it to remain a key feature of the landscape.
The work is now nearing completion, and we have been very surprised to find that the pale blue material which from a distance we took to be temporary tarpaulin covering the construction is in fact the finished article. There has been an unsympathetic ground floor extension in stone which looks rather like a 1960s public toilet. More startling is the bright blue tongue and groove erection covering what is left of the original external staircase (below). It has a rubberoid stepped roof with white plywood fascia. This part of the development dominates the appearance of this modest tower. It’s a real shocker! What was an ‘eye-catcher’ is now a major ‘eye-sore’.
It is hard to believe that this development was sanctioned by Historic Scotland in the form that it now presents to the world or that regular monitoring by the authorities has not noticed the failure to comply with the requirements to protect the visual, historical and architectural integrity of this landmark tower. It’s clear that even when we believe that appropriate conditions have been attached to a development as a result of advice and intervention, there is a need for continued close monitoring. It is to be hoped that retrospective action will be taken to remedy or ameliorate the effect of this damage to the focus of Caldwell’s Brandy Hill gardens.
The Channel 4 team is now doing a follow up to the original transmission. The continuing research work of the volunteer group and the GHSS view of the tragedy have been expressed in an interview for the programme, though of course only a selected fraction of the dialogue is likely to be given air time.
Watch it here, at least for a while
Tailpiece: 1 March 2012
John West writes:
Readers will be pleased to learn that East Renfrewshire Council has been determined to enforce the planning conditions required for the restoration and development of Caldwell Tower. The Council’s Planning Enforcement Officer provided the image (below right) to confirm that the shocking blue painting of the extension’s boarding has been replaced by a less obtrusive green. Those with a sophisticated colour sense will marvel at the subtlety of the change, whilst the rest of us will wonder what, if anything, has been done or achieved.










We are members of the local Caldwell Golf Club and drive past the Tower every day and like you we had thought the blue material was a temporary covering of some sort. We too were extremely shocked and horrified to realise that this was in fact the finished article. Words cannot express how disappointing it is to think that the authorities have sanction this, never mind allow it to happen in the first place. It is like watching a cartoonist (no disrespect no cartoonists!)draw a mustache and dark rim glasses on the Mona Lisa! Whilst it is never desirable to see the structure deteriorate, it is however a travesty to allow this kind of work to be carried out for what would appear to be nothing other than motivated by letting potential, given the history and importance attached to the Tower. We echo your views and hope that the powers that be will work together to restore the Tower back to its former glory.
i was in this area last weekend and could not believe what i was looking at,what a disgrace who ever signed this off from historic scotland and the local authority should be shot,i was told the owner has been told to paint it green.lining board,upvc facias,plastic gutters and white windows.
i think they got the specification for a timber garage not a historic building.such a simple build went terribly wrong.
If there is one thing worse than seeing a decaying historic building slowly crumble it has to be when a building is allowed to be restored in such a way that from 100 yards any reasonable person would say “what an eyesore”. Words fail me.
They have turned quite a pleasant historic sight into an absolute midden.
Frankly it would look better a burned out ruin than how it looks now. Historic Scotland and East Renfewshire Council should hang their heads in shame.
I am hoping we have terrible storms this winter and the turqoise lean-to extension ends up in the lady captain’s carparking space at nearby Caldwell Golf Club.
I have just watched The Resteration Man programme on Channel 4 featuring Caldwell Tower. I cannot believe that planning have supported such a monstrosety to be built. The stone built extension is in keeping with the rest of the tower, however, the blue clading that has been allowed to be erected is a disgrace.
I felt so sorry for the previous gentleman who owned the tower as he had put in planning for a more sympathestic extension and that would be in keeping with the rest of the material.
caldwell tower looks awful.
I hope the planning department see sense and instruct Barry and his wife to do something with the blue extension.
It’s the foulest, ugliest thing i’ve ever seen, I immediately thought of the old cheaply built social housing projects of Hulme, Manchester and many more in the early eighties (legolands we used to call them) or a 1970s extension. How on earth did they approve this eyesore when that poor man (previous owner) had his designs flatly turned down, and they were great compared to this!! saying that, a garden shed would be great compared to this. Rough Council estate chic!!!
We have just watched a tv programme about the so-called restoration of the tower. It beggars belief that the planning authorities could have sanctioned such a horrible and sorry addition to the stark and dramatic outline of the original building.
The programme focussed on the ‘amateur’ methods used by the owner – using an architect from Essex, someone without conservation experience, and designs submitted by engineers who had not even visited the site.
However, the programme also discussed the unhelpful and high-handed responses of the planners to several earlier applications.
How and why these planners agreed to this plan is mysterious and sad.
I am grieving for the tower, the local people who have to look at this shabby mess, and for what might have been.
Not being aware of this matter previously, I have just watched a repeat of the Channel 4 programme and could not believe what I was seeing. I fully understand and share the above concerns and thought there must be like-minded people sharing their views on the web.
As a planning consultant I am used to the media not representing the full picture and there usually being two sides to every story. In this case, whilst I am suprised that the stepped solution was found acceptable by the planning authority and conservation bodies in principle, a check of the approved plans on the council website would suggest that the development as built is substantially different to that permitted. The height as built (from the above photo and watching the programme) judged relative to the height of the tower, appears noticeably higher than that shown on the approved elevation drawings, hence why it appears disproportionate and out of scale, notwithstanding the poor materials, detailing and colour finishes used (which the council may also not have signed off as the conditions on the planning permission and listed building consent require). The council presumably checked and was satisfied with the accuracy of the submitted drawings as providing a basis upon which to determine the application favourably.
If a development is not built in accordance with all aspects of the approved consent, it does not benefit from planning permission. If not already done so, the council should be asked to investigate and determine whether there has been a breach of the planning permission in this respect and if so, what the remedy is to be, with the option of taking appropriate enforcement action if expedient to do so.
I saw the programme last night and the extension is hideous. Something really lovely could have been achieved with glass and natural coloured timber, but it is amazing to me that those plans were turned down and THIS was allowed, arrowslits and all. Deepest sympathy. i’ve never seen the Tower but would hate to be looking at it now.
I am truly in a state of disbelief that this has ben allowed. We spend months, even years in getting a small roof light on a historic property, and enter into serious,comprehensive dialogue with English heritage when we get involved in such schemes “down South”. The real travesty is what is happening to Scotland generally, with a rush to allow development, seemingly at any cost to it’s Heritage and landscape. This utter disaster is a combination of a total lack of taste aesthetic and judgement by the owner and a presumably cut price”designer’ with no real understanding of what he working on. I also suspect, the final straw was a” leaned on” planning team, staffed by weak, junior , demoralised and unqualified people who have been forced to pass plans for the greater good of the country’s economic development ( another holiday home!). Yeah- Hah, welcome to cowboy Scotland!! No wonder I now practice in a land where people care about their Heritage
Caught the Channel 4 programme last night; how could this have been allowed to happen? From the cutting of stone with a sthil-saw, to the cast concrete lintels and faux ground floor ‘arrow slits’, I could sense all was not well, however non of this prepared me for the final unveiling. Totally dumbfounded, I retired to bed, my blood at boiling point! After the noble pronouncements of the man from Scottish Heritage, it calls into question just what went on behind the scenes. Yes, our heritage is important and no one would want to see any historic building fall into ruin. Likewise, one has to concede that compromise is necessary to enable effective 21st century usage. However . . .
I watched Restoration Man last night and could not believe my eyes at such a horrific development. It looks like a vertical portakabin and is one of the least sympathic adaptations I’ve ever seen. Very unfortunate
So that’s what Essex looks like!
This of course is an eyesore to even the most ardent modernist. Perhaps the relatively new Retro vogue is the inspiration for Barrie & Fiona. If that is the case they have managed to emulate the worst architect of the worst architectural era in British history. Of all the famous English architects they could have chose to flatter by copying a style it looks like they chose J.G.L.Poulson.
I know that often the juxtaposition of old and new can work and that sometimes incongruity can be pleasantly quirky – but this, this is just dreadful. The poor thing! It almost looks embarrassed, like a Father caught indulging a young daughter by modeling a dress and make up.
Flat felted stepped roof! Even the fascia boards aren’t level! – not that it matters! The British weather has a particular attitude towards poor quality and design, it will soon blow this canker off the old Tower.
But perhaps we are missing something – It may be more Poulsonesque than we imagine! Poulson and several of his pocketed planners were jailed for corruption, and lets face it, whoever sanctioned this defacement must have either took a bung, or is, due to some silly councils policy of ‘positive discrimination’ quite blind.
Just watched my recording of The Restoration Man re-run of Thursday 2nd February on Channel 4. The simply hideous pale blue and white lego steps up the exterior (as featured above)were shown in their full glory (ha).
Has anyone viewed them yet in their new green guise, offering us perhaps some improvement as it tries to blend with nature ?
Please see my comments posted today on The Folly Fellowship Forum.
I live local to the tower, fortunately not with a view to it though. The blue cladding remains, and as of 6th Feb 2012 hasn’t yet been painted blue. Not that a paint job will make any difference to the conversion. A truly awful attempt at restoration and everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves. Vandals would have done a better job.
Oops I meant hasn’t yet been painted green!
It’s an absolute disgrace, this property should have been PROTECTED by the planning laws and Historic Scotland, it’s an utter travesty that planning for this was given. I really don’t go for the excuse that it has saved an otherwise doomed property etc. It is an historic property and an important landmark. The add on on the side wouldn’t go amiss on a caravan! it’s revolting.
If we can’t rely on Historic Scotland and the plannng laws to protect our historical architecture then who can we rely on?
I’m absolutely dumbfounded, this is architectural vandalism.
Disgusted.
Don’t you have any local vandals who may take pity on the peope who have to look at this everyday?! Hmm maybe not …but still…
I think it looks very nice.
I’ve just watched my recording of Restoration Man and I felt like I needed to search the net and find out if other people were annoyed as I am! – It seems they are!!!
I usually get frustrated at the planning dept, thinking they would rather see the building collapse than allow someone to develop it into a home, but in this case I think I would rather see the tower in ruin, atleast then it’s history wouldn’t have this blemish!
What the hell were the fake arrow slits about?
I think George was pretty angry when he saw the finished article!
I hope the owners are embarrassed and made to rip it down!
We have just watched a recording of Restoration Man. What a hideous addition! Surely a two storey extension in stone with a roof replicating the existing roof would be far more in keeping than this monstrosity.Even if it is painted green (which would blend in much better-depends what colour green though)it is still unacceptable.
The website is my son`s who two years ago year provided the owners of Caldwell Tower with a drawing of a proposed entrance to Caldwell Tower which can be seen at top left on p8 of his web site. I`m sure you will agree that it is much more appropriate than that now in place.
Possibly one of the worst restoration jobs of all time, absolutely no redeeming features, even the inside was tragic. Its hard to imagine that an architect came up with the drawing and Historic Scotland approved it. They should have paid the the owner to put the roof on and windows in then walk away.
I felt sorry for George he was too polite to say it was crap but it was written all over his face!
This is atrocious – tacky and completely out of touch with the history of this beautiful building. Completely disrespectful to Scottish Heritage. Treasures should be preserved not destroyed!
This is deeply shocking! I am horrified. This is offensive on so many levels. Historic Buildings are being lost and destroyed at an alarming rate right across Scotland. In many cases Historic Scotland and the Local Authorities turn a blind eye. Scotland, for goodness’ sake, WAKE UP!!!!!
I didn’t see much of the TV programme, but I pass Caldwell tower on a daily basis and am completely astounded by what has been done. Are the windows really uPVC? Is the ugly black guttering (which jutts over the wooden extension with no thought to the lines of the building) actually plastic? Was a B&Q door really approved for use on this building? I can find no redeeming features, whatsoever, this “restoration”.
Have any planning officers actually visited this site, because it beggars belief that they would sign off such an ugly, tatty abomination?
I would also have much prefered if the building had been left to the ravages of the Scottish weather than have to see this blot on the landscape every day.
i see caldwell tower often when im visiting up that way, i also used to play there as a young girl with my siblings, i still take my kids up to see it today, i can understand people being angry and commenting eyesore, i had a gasp of air when i myself first seen it ” finished “. i find that some of the comments ‘revoltining and such likes’ not very fair, as far as im aware the owners are trying to recitify the issues that concern you all, it was never to be left that colour, i think it would be good for everyone to remember this is a tough economical time for everyone, maybe the owners just haven’t had the spare cash lying around to finish?? maybe his time has been taken up with life situations?? give them a chance to sort the problem and you can all count to ten and breathe that anger away!
The person that approved planning should be fired!!!!! This is a disgrace to Scottish history!
I’m utterly aghast at how unsympathetic the alterations are – truly the doings of a committee.
There has been a raft of far better designs which have been rejected over the years. I quite liked the look of the one with the round stair tower as well as the traditional oak framed structure – either would have been infinitely better than what the poor people of Uplawmoor now have to look at every day.
Seriously… what were the councilors thinking when they approved this dog’s breakfast? I can only describe the approved design, with its jumble of roof levels, jutting angles and faux “period features”, as hideous and grossly inappropriate. The stonework on the ground floor looks like it was designed by Walt Disney on an off day and the stair enclosure by Joseph Stalin.
On the up side, the neighbouring farmer might find a roaring trade selling sick bags to passers-by.